|
Published: 17:33 EST,
July 20, 2007
Endangered Species Rulings Under Review
By JOHN HEILPRIN, Associated Press Writer
(AP) -- Decisions to reduce federal protection for the
Rocky Mountain jumping mouse, a Western bird known as the "mosquito king"
and other threatened creatures will be reconsidered after alleged improper
meddling by a senior Interior Department official.
H. Dale Hall, the director of the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, on Friday ordered the review of eight endangered species
decisions in which former deputy assistant secretary Julie MacDonald was
involved.
MacDonald's resignation from the post overseeing Fish and Wildlife and the
National Park Service was announced in May after the department's inspector
general rebuked her for pressuring scientists to alter their findings about
endangered species and leaking information about them to industry officials.
Among the eight decisions, two involve the Preble's meadow jumping mouse.
One was a 2005 proposal to remove the 9-inch mouse, named for its ability to
leap twice its length and pivot midair, from the government's endangered
species list. The second was a 2003 decision about the amount of acreage
that should be protected to help the mouse recover.
Other species covered by Hall's order are the Southwestern willow
flycatcher, white-tailed prairie dog, arroyo toad, California red-legged
frog, Canada lynx and 12 species of Hawaiian picture-wing flies.
"We want to make sure that the science is true," Hall told reporters in a
teleconference Friday.
He said he ordered the reviews based on the recommendations of his regional
directors, whom he had asked to study MacDonald's decisions.
"It's a blemish, I believe, on the scientific integrity of the Fish and
Wildlife Service and the Department of the Interior, so we're going to place
a pretty high priority on trying to get those done," he said. "We wouldn't
be doing them if we didn't at least suspect that the decision will be
different. But I don't want to predetermine outcome."
Rep. Nick Rahall, D-W.Va., chairman of the House Natural Resources
Committee, praised the Interior Department for "stepping up to the plate to
begin addressing the 'politics trumps science' ploy endemic throughout this
administration." His committee held a hearing on MacDonald's actions shortly
after her resignation was announced.
"What we have learned to date raises concerns about political tinkering with
science that has affected perhaps 100 endangered species-related decisions -
and goodness knows what else - that deserve further scrutiny," Rahall said
Friday.
Hall said he had decided, based on regional directors' recommendations,
against revisiting decisions affecting three other species: the Mexican
garter snake found in the waters of Arizona and New Mexico; the bull trout
of the Northwest; and the marbled murrelet seabird found along the Pacific
Coast.
Environmentalists noted that Hall was agreeing to review only about a third
of the cases in which misconduct by MacDonald was alleged.
"While we welcome the revisiting of decisions where political interference
has been documented, the list of species under consideration is neither
comprehensive nor exhaustive," said Francesca Grifo, director of the Union
of Concerned Scientists' integrity program.
"The real culprit here is not a renegade political appointee." Grifo said.
"The real culprit is a process where decisions are made behind closed
doors."
---
http://www.physorg.com/news104171585.html
July 20, 2007
FWS Acknowledges "Inappropriate Influence"
In Decision-Making; Actions Insufficient to Restore Scientific Integrity to
Policy Making
Statement By
Francesca Grifo, Union Of Concerned Scientists Scientific Integrity Program
Director
|
WASHINGTON (July 20, 2007) – Today, the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) announced that it would review a
small number of the Endangered Species Act decisions in which disgraced
former Interior Department Deputy Assistant Secretary for Wildlife and
Parks Julie MacDonald had participated, acknowledging for the first time
that MacDonald had "inappropriate influence" over endangered species
science.
FWS will review eight cases, approximately
one third of those in which misconduct has been alleged. Notably, the
agency decided not to review the bull trout decision, where an economic
analysis was distorted and censored, and the marbled murrelet decision,
where officials overruled the scientific determinations of FWS
scientists.
For more information:
A to Z Guide to Political Interference in Science
Numerous investigations found that MacDonald, a political appointee with
no relevant scientific background, had bullied scientists and personally
rewritten scientific documents to prevent the protection of imperiled
species. Today's announcement comes just a week after former Surgeon
General Richard Carmona testified that he had been muzzled for political
reasons. Political interference in science has been reported on scores
of issues across multiple federal agencies.
Political interference in science at FWS has become pervasive. In a 2005
Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) survey of FWS scientists, 84
scientists reported having been directed to inappropriately exclude or
alter technical information from FWS scientific documents. Furthermore,
303 scientists, or two thirds of those who responded to the survey, knew
of cases where Interior Department political appointees had interfered
with scientific determinations.
Below is a statement by Francesca Grifo, UCS Scientific Integrity
Program director:
"While we welcome the revisiting of decisions where political
interference has been documented, the list of species under
consideration is neither comprehensive nor exhaustive.
If the agency truly wants to get to the bottom of this, then asking the
regional directors to identify the problems is not enough. Any agency
scientist should have been able to provide input.
The real culprit here is not a renegade political appointee. The real
culprit is a process where decisions are made behind closed doors.
Information is the currency of democracy.
Americans have the right to know the scientific basis of decisions that
affect the survival of species they care about. Until the
decision-making process is open to public scrutiny, science will
continue to be endangered at the Interior Department.
Months have gone by since these allegations came to light without a
clear signal from Secretary Kempthorne that manipulation of science will
not occur under his watch. Secretary Kempthorne should send a clear
message to all Interior appointees that substituting opinion for science
is unacceptable.
The Interior Department should engage in a systematic review of all Bush
administration decisions—not just those where interference has been
exposed—to ensure that the science behind those decisions was not
altered or distorted."
|
http://www.ucsusa.org/news/press_release/fws-acknowledges-047-1.html
|